Potentially sacred site delays border wall construction

Bobby Wallace offered up a prayer before he and other tribal leaders led the group of about 100 protesters to a Campo construction site with demands for an environmental monitor trained to identify Kumeyaay artifacts.

It was only the first week in July but the desert heat had already hit 90 degrees by 8 a.m. outside the Golden Acorn Casino in Campo Wednesday.

About 100 people, mostly young to middle-aged adults, stood in a large circle listening as Bobby Wal­lace, a member of the Barona Band of Mission Indians Kumeyaay Na­tion and a Lakeside resident, led the group in discussion and prayer before departing for the site where a portion of the Trump administra­tion’s border wall is being built, pos­sibly on top of ancient Kumeyaay remains.

While a bundle of smoldering sage made its way around the gath­ering, La Posta tribal member Cyn Parada joined Wallace at the center of the circle.

“Today will be a good day,” Parada said.

Medics were on hand for support when Kumeyaay tribal leaders and community members gathered July 1 to protest construction of a border wall in Campo that might contain ancient remains and artifacts.

“All blasting in this area has been halted until they talk with us. We’re asking for three things: one, soil testing for bones; two, monitors who are trained to spot native items; three, to have no more work done until the first two things are in place.”

It was the second time in one week that Parada had reached out to the community to ask for help holding off the Army Corps of Engineers from mov­ing forward with demolition on a site she says falls on untreat­ied ancient Kumeyaay territory that is potentially ripe with un­found artifacts.

“Our people lived here thou­sands and thousands of years before it was a reservation. It is also Kumeyaay land. We had someone from Kumeyaay Com­munity College find what he believes is a shoulder bone,” Parada said.

The 27-year old elected tribal council member said the poten­tially significant find turned up on Monday, before the United States Border Patrol released a statement later that day stat­ing they had the whole area surveyed and found nothing.

“Based on prior environmen­tal surveys and stakeholder coordination completed, no bio­logical, cultural, or historical sites were identified within the blasting area located within the Roosevelt Reservation,” states the June 29 release from Border Patrol public affairs officer Jus­tin Castrejon.

Parada said the tribal mem­bers are not necessarily against the border wall but want soil testing and monitors before the project proceeds.

After the group drove to the nearby site, they encountered a chained gate blocking the pri­vate road, guarded by Border Patrol officers who were joined about 10 minutes later by Army Corps of Engineers workers.

Angela Elliott-Santos is chair­woman of the Manzanita Band of the Kumeyaay Nation; she rose to the front of the group and asked Army Corps of Engi­neers worker Darrell Williams if he was able to contact a super­visor to determine whether a trained environmental monitor was on site as stated in the June 29 public affairs release.

“I’m asking you today as the Manzanita chairwoman, is there a monitor out there on-site today? There are plenty of ways to keep us informed ahead of time — is the law being up­held?” asked Elliott-Santos.

Williams claimed he could not contact a supervisor; Wal­lace bought the group a little time to pray while giving au­thorities time to produce an en­vironmental monitor.

“We’d like to go out and be with our ancestors, practice the Religious Freedoms Act. We know you might have a little apprehension but we want to go out there and hold a peace­ful prayer with our ancestors,” Wallace said.

The tribal leaders negotiated three hours to pray on site, os­tensibly enough time for the Corps to contact supervisors and determine details of envi­ronmental monitoring being done on site.

Manzanita tribal member Brooke Baines later said in a follow-up call that the fight is not about the wall itself.

“I want to make sure that it is made very clear that our point is not about the wall, it is about the execution of the wall. We’re not asking for the wall to be abolished, and we’re not saying we won’t ask for that in the fu­ture. It’s about having respect for the land, the ancestors and the history that it holds,” Ba­ines said.

If remains are found on the site, she says the ideal outcome would be to relocate and rebury human remains, and place any found artifacts in a museum if the entire site cannot be pro­tected.

After the morning’s prayer session, Parada said she still had not received confirmation of an environmental monitor be­ing present on-site.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here